Turbulence in the Bureaucratic Environment, a Consequence of Regional Budget Efficiency in South Buton Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjss.v4i4.831Keywords:
M Bureaucracy, Budget Efficiency, Environmental TurbulenceAbstract
Turbulence of the bureaucratic environment as a result of the efficiency of the public sector budget in the Regional Secretariat of South Buton Regency. The importance of this research lies in the fact that budget efficiency is not just a fiscal instrument, but also a source of environmental turbulence that has direct implications for the stability and performance of regional bureaucracies. To answer these problems, this study uses a qualitative approach based on the theory of bureaucratic environmental turbulence. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation, then analyzed qualitatively through the process of reduction, presentation, and a conclusion drawn. The results of the study show that the turbulence of the bureaucratic environment is driven by budget efficiency, which is characterized by increasing economic policy uncertainty, political pressure, public and media demands, and regional fiscal limitations. This turbulence forces the bureaucracy to make rapid adaptations that are not always followed by structural readiness and organizational capacity
References
Agus, B., Adawiyah, W. R., & Ahmad, A. A. (2025). Navigating the Storm : How Budgetary Turbulence Shapes Regional Economies and Lives. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 23, 5508–5525.
Akbar, R., Pilcher, R., & Perrin, B. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 262–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140581211283878
Alawia, M. T. (2025). Turbulensi Anggaran Memoderasi Pengaruh Karakteristik Tujuan Anggaran dan SIPKD terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Solusi, 23(4 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.26623/slsi.v23i4.12943
Almhairat, A. J. (2025). Bureaucracy Theory Revisited: Max Weber’s Ideal Type and its Contemporary Relevance in Organizational Science. Australian Academic & Educational Services (AAES), 2(3), 16–27.
Ansell, C, & Torfing, J. (2022). Handbook on theories of governance. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tElgEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=governance+transformation&ots=RTcn4fr94s&sig=loVrXnTbKfILRn_0JXM4RJcXEZc
Ansell, Christopher. (2025). Robust Governance in Turbulent Times Jacob Torfing , and Jarle Trondal (Vol. 4058).
Ansell, Christopher, & Torfing, J. (2022). Administrasi publik dan politik menghadapi turbulensi : Pencarian respons tata kelola yang kuat. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874
Ashill, N. J., Rod, M., & Carruthers, J. (2008). The Effect of Management Commitment to Service Quality on Frontline Employees’ Job Attitudes, Turnover Intentions and Service Recovery Performance in a New Public Management Context. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(5), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540802480944
Beetham, D. (1996). Bureaucracy. University of Minnesota Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KtFI15WCr_8C
Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., & Meier, K. J. (2009). Environmental Turbulence, Organizational Stability, and Public Service Performance. Administration & Society, 4(8), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708326333
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Cresswell 2007 QUALITATIVE INQUIRY ok.pdf (Second). Sage Publications.
Dwiyanto. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. UGM PRESS. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=vTMXEAAAQBAJ
Fan, B., & Pan, T. (2023). Does information technology–organizational resource interaction affect E-government performance? Moderating roles of environmental uncertainty. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101830
Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational Identity Formation and Change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.762225
HOOD, C. (1991). a Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Ishak, P., & Sholehah, N. L. H. (2023). DAMPAK TURBULENSI LINGKUNGAN, SELF-ESTEEM DAN BUDGET EMPHASIS TERHADAP BUDGETARY SLACK. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING, 7(1 SE-Articles), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.30871/jama.v7i1.4853
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015
Kurnia, T., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., & Putera, R. E. (2022). Leveraging Agile Transformation: Redesigning Local Government Governance. KnE Social Sciences. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/10589
Kusnadi, D. (2011). MENGGAGAS BIROKRASI YANG TRANSPARAN DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK. NALAR FIQH, 3(1), 131–144.
Lazimatul, N., Sholehah, H., Ishak, P., City, G., & Province, G. (2022). Impact of Environmental Turbulence , Self-Esteem and Budget Emphasis on Budgetary Slack. 1(2), 73–81.
Mbabu, M., & Abong’o, B. (2025). Environmental Turbulence and its impact on Strategy. Greener Journal of Economics and Accountancy, 12, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjea.2025.1.121724199
Micacchi, M., Cucciniello, M., Trivellato, B., Cristofoli, D., Turrini, A., Valotti, G., & Nasi, G. (2025). How to organize in turbulence : arrangements and pathways for robust governance. January, 231–247.
Migchelbrink, K., & Walle, S. Van De. (2019). When Will Public Officials Listen? A Vignette Experiment on the Effects of Input Legitimacy on Public Officials’ Willingness to Use Public Participation. Public Administration Review, 00, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13138
Milliken, F. (1987). Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306502
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (revisi ke). Remaja rosda karya.
Muhammad, I., & Nasution, N. (2022). Bureaucratic Turbulence After the Transfer of Structural to Functional Positions at the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs. 10(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmsda.v10i2.2759
Nashiruddin, M. I. (2019). Business Strategies in a Turbulent Business Environment : Findings from Indonesian Telecommunication Industry Strategi Bisnis dalam Lingkungan Bisnis yang Bergejolak : Temuan dari Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia. Pekommas, 4(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2019.2040201
Nkone, B., Matoka, C., & Ngirwa, C. (2025). Effect of Employee Morale on Successful Implementation of Strategic Plan in Public Sector : A Case of Selected Institutions under the Ministry of Health. IRJEMS, 4(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I1P107
Osborne, S. P. (2010). THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE ? Taylor & Francis.
Quinn, K. S. C. . R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework Addison-Wesley series on organization development Jossey-Bass business & management series. John Wiley & Sons.
Rahimpour, M., & Fattahi, R. (2025). New Public Financial Management: Trends, Frameworks, and Challenges. Public Sector Accounting and Budgeting, 6(3). https://www.psabjournal.ir/article_233619.html
Romanelli, M. L. L. T. ; E. (1994). Organizational Transformation As Punctuated Equilibrium : An Empirical. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166.
Samson, A. T. (2015). Strategic orientations reconfiguring capability,environmental turbulence and export performance of SMES in Nigeria. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:112072123
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Pearson Prentice Hall. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=fVK5AAAAIAAJ
Setiyowati, M. D., & Reviandani, O. (2024). Penerapan prinsip utama good governance pada laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah di bappeda kabupaten sidoarjo. 4(1), 117–125.
Staroňová, K., & Rybář, M. (2025). 8: The autonomy of senior civil servants (pp. 133–151). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803927046.00018
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2014). Managing Democracies in Turbulent Times: Trust, Performance, and Governance in Modern States . Pp. 83–120). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54072-1_5
