A Comparative Study of SAW, WP, and TOPSIS Methods for Gaming Laptop Selection

Authors

  • Ryanda Deanova Pamulang University
  • Bagus Firmansyah Pamulang University
  • Vially Putra Priyanto Pamulang University
  • Akianus Wenda Pamulang University
  • Muhammad Arfan Albaar Pamulang University
  • Abdullah Amiruddin Pamulang University
  • Perani Rosyani Pamulang University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i6.394

Keywords:

Decission Support System, SAW Method, WP, Method, TOPSIS Method, Gaming Laptop

Abstract

The increasing demand for high-performance gaming laptops requires a systematic decision-making approach to select the most suitable product. This study compares three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods: Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Weighted Product (WP), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to determine the best gaming laptop. A dataset of six premium laptops was evaluated based on seven criteria, including specifications, portability, and price. Numerical scoring and sensitivity analysis were applied to assess method stability. The results indicate differences in rankings produced by each method, providing insight into their reliability for supporting gaming laptop selection decisions

References

Gill, S. S., Wu, H., Patros, P., Ottaviani, C., Arora, P., Pujol, V. C., Haunschild, D., Parlikad, A. K., Cetinkaya, O., Lutfiyya, H., Stankovski, V., Li, R., Ding, Y., Qadir, J., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Song, H. H., Sakellariou, R., Rana, O., … Buyya, R. (2024). Modern computing: Vision and challenges. In Telematics and Informatics Reports (Vol. 13). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100116

Hassan, I., Alhamrouni, I., & Azhan, N. H. (2023). A CRITIC–TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Solar PV Farm. Energies, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104245

Jansen, L. Z. H., Van Loo, E. J., Bennin, K. E., & van Kleef, E. (2023). Exploring the role of decision support systems in promoting healthier and more sustainable online food shopping: A card sorting study. Appetite, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106638

Laguna Salvadó, L., Villeneuve, E., Masson, D., Abi Akle, A., & Bur, N. (2022). Decision Support System for technology selection based on multi-criteria ranking: Application to NZEB refurbishment. Building and Environment, 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108786

Nuraini, R., Alamsyah, D., Septarini, R. S., Aristo, A., & Sinlae, J. (2022). Sawo Manila No.61 Jakarta Selatan 12520, Indonesia 2,3 Teknik Informatika. In Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan I (Vol. 14, Issue 1).

Panjaitan, M. I. (2019). Login : Jurnal Teknologi Komputer Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method in Determining Beneficiaries of Foundation Benefits. Jl. Kol. Yos Sudarso No.45 AB, 13(1), 19–25. http://login.seaninstitute.org/index.php/Login 19Journalhomepage:

http://login.seaninstitute.org/index.php/Login

Rizal, C., Siregar, S. R., Supiyandi, S., Armasari, S., & Karim, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Manager Penjualan. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 3(3), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v3i3.1094

Sabandar, V. P. (2023). Decision Support System for Gaming Laptop Selection Using AHP. Journal of Information Technology, Software Engineering and Computer Science (ITSECS), 1(3), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.58602/itsecs.v1i3.53

Setiawan, G. I., & Indrawan, I. P. E. (2023). Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Dalam Perekrutan Calon Karyawan. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 4(3), 962–968. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v4i3.3128

Syifa, F., Rahim, A., Abidin, Z., Pangestu, F., & Asari, A. (2023). UJI SENSITIVITAS METODE WP, SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM MENENTUKAN TITIK LOKASI REPEATER INTERNET WIRELESS. https://journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/logic

Taherdoost, H. (2023). Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW) as a MultiAttribute Decision-Making Technique: A Step-by-Step Guide. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 6(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i1.5400

Tarnanidis, T., Papathanasiou, J., Mareschal, B., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2025). MCDM Review in marketing and managerial decisions: Practical implications and Future research. Management Science Letters, 15(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2024.3.004

Wang, J., Isnain, A. R., Suryono, R. R., Rahmanto, Y., Mesran, M., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Decision Support System for Platform Selection in E-Commerce Using the OWH-TOPSIS Method. Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC), 6(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v6i1.5990

Waqas Arshad, M., & Rahmanto, Y. (2024). Combination of TOPSIS Method and PIPRECIA Weighting for Best Hotel Selection. International Journal of Informatics and Data Science, 1(2). https://journals.adaresearch.or.id/ijids/index

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Ryanda Deanova, Bagus Firmansyah, Vially Putra Priyanto, Akianus Wenda, Muhammad Arfan Albaar, Abdullah Amiruddin, & Perani Rosyani. (2025). A Comparative Study of SAW, WP, and TOPSIS Methods for Gaming Laptop Selection. International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 4(6), 1461–1482. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i6.394

Issue

Section

Articles