Visual Capital Translation: Habitus, Field, and Multimodality in Bugis Pinisi Representation

Authors

  • Irfandi Musnur Indonesia Institut of Arts Bali
  • I Wayan Mudra Indonesia Institut of Arts Bali
  • Ni Made Ruastiti Indonesia Institut of Arts Bali
  • Ariani Kusumo Wardhani Mercu Buana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v5i1.817

Keywords:

Bugis Pinisi, Visual Design, Multimodality, Habitus, Symbolic Capital, Visual Representation

Abstract

The Bugis Pinisi, formerly the pinnacle of traditional Nusantara maritime technology, has evolved from a practical sailing craft into a cultural symbol and aesthetic component in the visual communication design of South Sulawesi. This alteration encompasses not just aesthetic aspects but also reflects social, economic, and political dynamics, wherein the Pinisi symbol serves as a medium for negotiating meaning and the struggle for symbolic power. This study employs Pierre Bourdieu's framework of field, habitus, and symbolic capital to elucidate how the visual depiction of the Pinisi is shaped by the interactions among various actors, including the government, designers, tourism stakeholders, and artisan groups. The maritime habitus of the Bugis people serves as an essential foundation, augmented by qualitative visual analysis techniques grounded in multimodality within Visual Communication Design theory. The results show that Pinisi pictures experience stylization, deformation, and alteration to align with contemporary marketing requirements, frequently altering historical values into market narratives. The preeminence of governmental and economic entities reinforces the hierarchy of symbolic authority, whilst the participation of traditional groups is constrained. The innovation of this research lies in the concept of Visual Capital Translation, which entails transforming cultural-symbolic capital into visual capital that is versatile in both local and global contexts, while preserving its inherent legitimacy. This research highlights the importance of inclusive design choices in preserving the authenticity and relevance of Pinisi

References

Akhmad, P. (2022). The process of making a Pinisi boat in Bantobahari District, Bulukumba Regency, Indonesia. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 7(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2022.7.5.2837

Ammarell, G. (1999). Bugis navigation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph No. 48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463402280182.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.ht.

Bourdieu, P. (2006). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (ebook ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499838.

Bourdieu, P. (2020). Habitus and field: General sociology, Vol. 2 (Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Druce, S. C. (2021). Personal reflections on fieldwork in South Sulawesi and engaging with the work of Christian Pelras on the Bugis. In Fieldwork and the self (pp. 329–351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2438-4_17.

Forceville, C. (1999). Educating the eye? Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996). Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 8(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204.

Gibson-Hill, C. A. (1949). Cargo boats of the East Coast of Malaya. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 22(3), 106–125. Retrieved from https://os.pends.org/arhebib_filestore/pdf_articles/JMBRAS/1949_22_3_Gibson-Hill.pdf.

Gibson-Hill, C. A. (1950). The Indonesian trading boats reaching Singapore. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 23(1), 108–138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41559486.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857.

Liebner, H. H. (2018). “Pinisi”: Terciptanya suatu ikon. Paper presented at the National Maritime Seminar: Sulawesi dalam Jaringan Dunia Maritim abad 17–20 (Memorial Lecture Dr. Edward L. Poelinggomang), Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, 10 Februari. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35875533/Pinisi_Terciptanya_Suatu_Ikon.

Nurabdiansyah, M. (2019). Semiotic studies of the Menara Pinisi symbolization in visual identity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Materials Research (ICAMR 2018), 227, 531–536. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.127.

Pelras, C. (2006). Manusia Bugis (N. A. Arsuka, Ed.; 1st ed.). Forum Jakarta-Paris Ecole Francaise d’Extreme-Orient.

Suparman, S. (2022). The essence of phinisi ship building for “Punggawa” in Bira. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia (JPPI), 8(4), 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221698.

UNESCO (2017). Pinisi, art of boatbuilding in South Sulawesi. Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/pinisi-art-of-boatbuilding-in-south-sulawesi-01197.

Wahyuni, W., & Sadik, I. (2022). Ritual dalam proses pembuatan perahu Pinisi. Sosioreligius: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama, 7(2), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.24252/sosioreligius.v7i2.33758.

https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=habitus-and-field-general-sociology-volume-2-1982-1983--9781509526697

https://www.liputan6.com/lifestyle/read/5284186/peserta-ktt-asean-2023-terkesan-naik-kapal-pinisi-di-labuan-bajo-berapa-harga-sewanya?page=2

https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2020/06/16/punya-uang-100-rupiah-gambar-perahu-anda-beruntung-ini-misteri-uang-kertas-paling-kontroversial?page=all#goog_rewarded

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Irfandi Musnur, Mudra, I. W., Ruastiti, N. M., & Wardhani, A. K. (2026). Visual Capital Translation: Habitus, Field, and Multimodality in Bugis Pinisi Representation . International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 5(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v5i1.817