Legal Consequences of a Statement Letter for the Transfer and Acceptance of Disputed Land Rights

Authors

  • Sindy Sri Widyawati S. Brahmana Brawijaya University
  • Amelia Sri Kusumadewi Brawijaya University
  • Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v5i6.356

Keywords:

Land Rights Transfer, Legal Statement Letter, Land Dispute, Normative Inconsistency, PPAT Authority

Abstract

The increasing public demand for land is closely linked to the transfer of land rights. Ideally, no legal action should be taken regarding the transfer of rights over land that is currently under dispute in court. However, normatively, such transfers are permitted under the revised ministerial regulation. Article 39 paragraph (1) letter F of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states that "a Land Deed Official (PPAT) must refuse to draw up a deed if the object of the legal act is in dispute concerning its physical and/or juridical data." In contrast, Article 126 paragraph (2) of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Regulation No. 16 of 2021 allows the registration of land rights transfer under dispute, provided the parties involved issue a "statement letter" from both the transferor and transferee. This research addresses the issue of normative inconsistency between these two provisions. The study applies normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, tertiary sources, and interviews. Data were analyzed through legal interpretation, systematization, and evaluation, supported by literature review from various academic libraries and legal documentation centers

References

Afifah, B., Suhadi, S., & Irawaty, I. (2024). Legal Security and Legal Protection in the First Time Land Registration Publication System in Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(VIII), 4469–4477. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080343

Phinesia, E. L. (2024). Penerapan Asas Praduga Keabsahan (Vermoeden Van Rechtmatigheid Preasumtio Iustae Causa) Dalam Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(5).

Rachmawati, F. A., Choirinnisa, S. A., & Latif, L. (2021). Integrated Land Registration System: Between Legal Certainty and Challenges (Case of Semarang City). Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 3(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v3i2.45895

Setiadi, W. (2012). Pembangunan hukum dalam rangka peningkatan supremasi hukum. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 1(1), 14.

Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sutedi, A. (2007). Peralihan hak atas tanah dan pendaftarannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Tyesta, L. T. A. L. W. (2020). Akibat hukum penggunaan sistem publikasi negatif berunsur positif dalam pendaftaran tanah di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Notarius, 13(2), 790.

Wahyunadi, Y. M. (n.d.). Kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2013). Pergeseran paradigma dalam kajian-kajian sosial dan hukum. Malang: Setara Press.

Yulianto, A. (n.d.). Penerapan pembatasan penuntutan hak atas tanah untuk menjamin kepastian hukum pemegang hak. Jurnal Notarius, 12(1), 481.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles