Flexible Pavement Thickness Design on Pahlawan Road Using the Bina Marga 2017 Method

Rezky Anisari; Ria Adriyati; Suwaji

doi:10.55927/mudima.v5i10.583

Authors

Rezky Anisari Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin
Ria Adriyati Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin
Suwaji Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v5i10.583

Keywords:

Pavement Thickness, Flexible Pavement, Bina Marga 2017, Traffic, CBR

Abstract

This study aims to design the flexible pavement thickness for the Pahlawan Road section in Gambut District, Banjar Regency, using the Bina Marga 2017 method. Increased traffic volume due to infrastructure development in the area has caused significant damage to the road body. To address this issue, a pavement structure capable of withstanding higher traffic loads is required. Primary data collected included a 3-day Average Daily Traffic (LHR) survey and on-site Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) testing, which yielded a subgrade CBR value of 5%. The analysis and calculations revealed that the optimal pavement layer thicknesses for a 20-year design life are: a 4 cm Asphalt Concrete-Wearing Course (AC-WC), a 6 cm Asphalt Concrete-Binder Course (AC-BC), an 8 cm Asphalt Concrete-Base (AC-Base), a 30 cm Class A Aggregat Foundation Layer (LFA), and a 20 cm Selected Fill. These calculations were based on a total Cumulative Equivalent Single Axle (CESA) value of 4,091,676.6, underscoring the need for a robust pavement structure. The study concludes that using appropriate design standards is crucial to ensuring the road's quality, safety, and durability against future traffic loads

References

AASHTO. (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Adnan, A., Rijal, S., & Suryadi, T. (2022). Evaluation of pavement deterioration due to high rainfall intensity in tropical climates. International Journal of Pavement Engineering and Transportation Infrastructure, 7(4), 155–164.

Alavi, H., Sadeghi, M., & Roshan, N. (2021). Quantitative analysis of pavement performance using mechanistic–empirical models. Transportation Research Record, 2675(8), 231–242.

Al‐Zubaidi, H., Hussain, M., & Rahim, M. A. (2022). Sensitivity analysis of flexible pavement design parameters under variable subgrade conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148(3), 04022015.

Arthono, A., & Pransiska, D. A. (2022). Analisis perbandingan perencanaan tebal perkerasan lentur metode AASHTO 1993 dan tebal perkerasan lentur metode Bina Marga 2017. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 15(1), 22–33.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2017). Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan (Revisi Juni 2017) No. 04/SE/Db/2017. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Faisal, M., Rahman, M. M., & Yusoff, N. I. M. (2020). Traffic loading estimation for flexible pavement design in developing countries. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21(9), 2771–2785.

Hankare, A. V., Bhujbal, P. B., Shinde, A. B., & Wagh, R. G. (2018). Design of Flexible Pavement: A Case Study. International Journal of Advance Research and Development, 3(3), 228–232.

Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hussain, M., Khan, A., & Rahim, M. A. (2023). Evaluation of axle load spectra for pavement design under mixed traffic conditions. Transportation Engineering Journal, 10(2), 145–158.

Irawan, D., Prasetyo, H., & Arifin, M. (2024). Field evaluation of subgrade CBR using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and its correlation with soil index properties. Geotechnical Research Journal of Indonesia, 5(1), 33–44.

Kusuma, Y., Aditya, R., & Wibowo, T. (2021). The influence of rainfall and drainage on flexible pavement failure in swampy areas. Civil Engineering Journal of Borneo, 3(2), 87–95.

Liu, Z., Wang, H., & Zhang, L. (2022). Improved prediction models for cumulative ESAL under mixed traffic flows. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148(6), 04022054.

Mahmood, S., Al‐Abed, A., & Kamel, A. (2021). Optimization of flexible pavement layer thickness using reliability-based approaches. Construction and Building Materials, 283, 122730.

Marlina, E., Frans, J. H., & Nasjono, J. K. (2023). Analisis tebal perkerasan lentur dengan metode Bina Marga 2017 dan program KENPAVE. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(2), 173–184.

Ministry of Public Works and Housing. (2017). Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan (MDP Bina Marga 2017). Directorate General of Highways, Indonesia.

Nugraha, D., Setiadi, A., & Hanif, M. (2023). Evaluation of subgrade soil bearing capacity using field DCP testing. Journal of Infrastructure and Geotechnical Engineering, 12(3), 215–226.

Rahman, M., Karim, M. R., & Haque, M. M. (2022). Development of regional axle load equivalency factors for road pavement design. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 15(4), 678–689.

Rauf, F., Tahir, M., & Idris, M. (2024). Characterization of soil strength for pavement design in tropical swamp areas. Indonesian Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6(2), 101–110.

Santoso, B., Widodo, S., & Ramadhan, H. (2023). Reliability assessment of flexible pavement design using Indonesian MDP 2017 standard. Journal of Road and Transport Engineering, 8(2), 92–103.

Sukirman, S. (2010). Perencanaan tebal struktur perkerasan lentur. Nova.

Tahar, F., Abdillah, M., & Shukri, M. A. (2021). Empirical correlation between DCP and CBR for tropical residual soils. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 53(5), 633–645.

Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2023). Validation of DCP–CBR correlation models for low-strength subgrade soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 23(1), 04022205.