Question Design and Risk of Distortion of Information in the Examination Report (BAP): A Forensic Linguistic–Psycholinguistic Analysis Based on the Distortion Risk Index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v5i1.827Keywords:
Examination Report, Question Design, Forensic Linguistics, Cognitive Load, Distortion Risk IndexAbstract
The Examination Report (BAP) is a key document in the judicial process because it records the testimony of the parties being questioned, but the question-and-answer format and evidentiary orientation have the potential to reshape the representation of testimony. This article analyzes the relationship between question design in the BAP and cognitive load and the risk of distortion through a forensic linguistics–psycholinguistics approach. The study applies Directed Qualitative Content Analysis (DQCA) with three components: (1) coding of question types (open, closed, leading, suggestive, confrontational, multi-part), (2) coding of cognitive load indicators (episodic recall, multi-component, quantification, topic switching, linguistic complexity), and (3) measuring the Distortion Risk Index (IRD) based on a score of 0–2 on nine distortion mechanisms (DR1–DR9). The unit of analysis is the investigator's questions (Q) and answers (A) mapped to the ID–EV–KR–PB–PN segments. These findings indicate that the KR contains more open-ended questions, while the PB and PN are dominated by confirmatory/presuppositional questions. Cognitive load increases in KR and PB, while EV/PN is relatively lighter but carries the risk of triggering compliance/commitment. Micro-analysis of Q–A indicates a shift from narrative elicitation to premise-based verification. IRD is offered as a practical, replicable tool to identify distortion hotspots and guide question design improvements
References
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Blanco, L. I. (2024). Forensic linguistics: The importance of language in interrogations (Trabajo de Fin de Grado, Universidad de Salamanca). GREDOS. http://hdl.handle.net/10366/160331
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Gómez Bedoya, M. (2022). Recognition and expression of rapport features in interpreter-mediated police interviews with victims (Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia). UEA Digital Repository. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/90202/
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hollands, M. J. (2017). Procedural justice at the custody desk: Exploring interpreter need identification (Master’s thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University). CCCU Research Space Repository. https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88qq9/procedural-justice-at-the-custody-desk-exploring-interpreter-need-identification
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hubert, J. M. (2017). False confessions: A linguistic analysis of police interrogation styles and question types (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
Kitaeff, J. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of police psychology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836170
Lai, M. (2016). Police cognitive interviews conducted through interpreters—An experimental study of the inherent conflicts in interlingual operations (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University). RMIT Research Repository. https://research-repository.rmit.edu.au/articles/thesis/Police_cognitive_interviews_conducted_through_interpreters-An_experimental_study_of_the_inherent_conflicts_in_interlingual_operations/27589755
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Lord, V. B., & Cowan, A. D. (2010). Interviewing in criminal justice: Victims, witnesses, clients, and suspects. Anderson Publishing.
Muniroh, R. D. D. (2019). “It’s better to see a tiger than a police officer”: Adapting the cognitive interviewing technique to the Indonesian policing context (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University). RMIT Research Repository. https://research-repository.rmit.edu.au/articles/thesis/_It_s_better_to_see_a_tiger_than_a_police_officer_Adapting_the_cognitive_interviewing_technique_to_the_Indonesian_policing_context/162708
Noc, M., Ginet, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2023). False confession in innocent suspects: A look at the cognitive interview for suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 38(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09543-5
Paas, F., van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8
Stott, C., Bradford, B., Radburn, M., & Savigar-Shaw, L. (Eds.). (2021). Making an impact on policing and crime: Psychological research, policy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326592
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Thompson, S. G. (2012). Judicial gatekeeping of police-generated witness testimony. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(2), 329–389.
Tong, S., Bryant, R., & Horvath, M. A. H. (2009). Future challenges in criminal investigation. In S. Tong, R. Bryant, & M. A. H. Horvath (Eds.), Understanding criminal investigation (pp. 217–222). Wiley-Blackwell.
van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Advances in research on worked examples, animations, and cognitive load measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9145-4
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
