Urgency Analysis of Constructivism-Based Mathematics Learning Model Integrated With Character Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v3i5.299Keywords:
Constructivism, Mathematics, EducationAbstract
This research aims to provide Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats analysis of the urgency of constructivism-based mathematics learning model integrated with character education to obtain information needed as a model needs analysis. This research is descriptive qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. Based on the data obtained through questionnaires, interviews and observations in the field study, then analysed using SWOT analysis to minimise existing weaknesses and threats, but together can maximise the strengths and opportunities that already exist. In general, based on the results of SWOT analysis, the constructivism-based mathematics learning model integrated with character education is a necessity so that several strategies can be used to maximize the existing strengths and opportunities and minimize the existing weaknesses and threats according to SWOT analysis
References
Amri, S. (2013). Pengembangan dan model pembelajaran dalam kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakarya.
Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (2005). Cognitive development in educational contexts: Implications of skill theory. In A. Demetriou (Ed.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development (pp. [page numbers]). New York: Routledge.
Cheng-An, T., Song, M.-Y. W., Lo, Y., & Lo, C.-C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability—An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daniastuti, E., & Haryadi, H. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik integratif berbasis nilai karakter disiplin dan percaya diri. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 7(2).
David, I. W. (2023). Towards a critical character education using virtue ethics philosophy and Bourdieu’s sociology. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2288360
Djamilah, B. W., & Wahyudin. (2015). Mengembangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan belief calon guru matematika melalui strategi perkuliahan kolaboratif. Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.4204
Dwi, M. F., Iltavia, I., & Ergusni, E. (2023). Pembelajaran matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI) dalam membangun karakter peserta didik. Lattice Journal. https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v3i1.6560
Harrison, T., Burn, E., & Moller, F. (2020). Teaching character: Cultivating virtue perception and virtue reasoning through the curriculum. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1538937
Husnul, F., Khairul, A., J. A., Dahlan, N., & Kec, M. (2024). Studi literatur: Peran pembelajaran matematika dalam pembentukan karakter siswa. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v3i1.2802
Ibrahim, S., & Suparni. (2012). Pembelajaran matematika, teori dan aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
In, J. L. (2013). Effective approaches for moral education to cultivate creativity and character in elementary school. The Journal of Ethics. https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.92.201311.79
Joko, W., Kusumawati, I., Nasir, A., & Bowo, A. (2021). Developing Pancasila and citizenship education learning model based on character education through comprehensive approach. Indonesian Journal of Educational Management and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i2.3239
Kholidah, S. (2018). Creating critical thinking from affective domain in successful learning of mathematics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6382
Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2021). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10086-5
Kotaro, K., & Jones, K. (2021). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-021-10086-5
Kukla, A. (2020). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Lickona, T., & Davitson, M. (2005). Smart & good high schools: Integrating excellence and ethics for success in school, work, and beyond. Center for the 4th and 5th Rs.
Major, T. E., & Mangope, B. (2012). The constructivist theory in mathematics: The case of Botswana primary schools. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 139-147.
Rahman, A. (2016). Pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika. Aksioma, 5(3).
Rosleny, B., & Syamsuddin, A. (2023). Using the aptitude-treatment interaction model integrated character values to improve mathematical story problem-solving skills for fifth-grade students. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.4.3.191
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (Teori-teori pembelajaran perspektif pendidikan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-based teaching and learning in Indonesian education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Walker, D. I. (2023). Towards a critical character education using virtue ethics philosophy and Bourdieu’s sociology. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2288360
Williams, M. M. (2000). Models of character education: Perspectives and developmental issues. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 39(1), 32-40.
Yanzhen, Z., Clayton, R. C., & Brian, C. S. (2023). PurposeFull People SEL and character education program: A cluster randomized trial in schools implementing Tier 1 PBIS with fidelity. School Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-023-09600-2
Zuchdi, D., Prasetya, K. Z., & Masruri, S. M. (2010). Pengembangan model pendidikan karakter terintegrasi dalam pembelajaran bidang studi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(3), 345-357.
